
To broaden my perspective on non-collegiates’ uses of Facebook, I interviewed (via email) Devan Rosen. A member of the Department of Speech at the University of Hawaii in Manoa, Professor Rosen has researched the impact of media consumption on social networking site (SNS) behavior, as well as cultural trends in user behavior. He is currently looking at the means by which people negotiate available resources via SNS and other Web 2.0 technologies.
HG: From your studies or observations, what can you say about uses of Facebook by non-collegiates?
DR: They use them very similarly to non-collegiates. The Internet has revolutionized the way that we interact with information, and transformed the way we each communicate with other. Instead of the antiquated injection model of media, media companies are harnessing the interactivity of communication technologies to bring the audience into the experience.
HG: Are there overall trends worth noting?
DR: Well, regarding the notion of “private,” there are some interesting trends, especially a willingness to participate in non-directed self-disclosure. I think it is more related to a rethinking of what it means to be “private.” If someone does not think that sharing intimate details of their day-to-day experiences in a blog is an invasion of their privacy, then it is not related to being shy. They still may be shy, but don’t consider the information to be private, thus not violating the context that they would normally be “shy” in.
Our findings do support the relationship between consumption of socially rewarding reality television and the likelihood to engage in what we call “promiscuous friending”, as well as engage in other Web 2.0 applications like sharing photos of oneself online. Promiscuous friending is where a social networking site (SNS) user accepts someone as a friend that they have not actually met. In this situation a stranger now has access to the private content of your personal SNS page as well as their other friends’ personal SNS site.
HG: Are non-collegiates most likely to be using the website for socializing, games, professional networking, and/or other functions?
DR: In most cases using SNS and other Web 2.0 applications augment physical interactivity by allowing users to keep closer connections to their weak ties, or people that are not close friends and family, rather that replacing physical with intellectual. It is easy to loose touch with people in ones social network that are not strong ties, so having access to communication technologies that assist in the maintenance of weak ties allows us to utilize a larger portion of our social network, at a much lower time and effort “cost.”
These technologies are providing a much richer toolbox for us to maintain, plan, and keep track of our social lives. In turn we are becoming much better at knowing how to utilize our social network to gain access to resources, from travel recommendations to emotional support. Every individual in our social networks represents a resource, and having a cogent knowledge of how to enable those resources makes us more successful social beings.
HG: Major advertisers have taken note of Facebook and begun placing ads, creating groups or product pages, etc. In your opinion, are these effective?
DR: Yes. People can now target, with remarkable specificity, the consumers that they need to reach. Then these sites allow for a viral spread of product support.
HG: Politicians have also taken note of Facebook and created groups or profile pages. News media articles will occasionally note the size of one candidate's page vs. her/her opponent's. In your opinion, besides the PR value, are these pages having a substantial effect?
DR: Traditionally, media content is the product of media companies, but new user-created and user-focused online platforms such as wikis, blogs, social networking sites, and media sharing sites allow for an increased notion of individual media ownership, and thus personal investment in media content. This makes the big wigs very, very nervous; those who control content control culture, and there is big money on controlling culture, as well as political discourse.
HG: Anything else you can tell me on this topic?
DR: SNS are allowing people to find solidarity with those that they have affiliations with, from sailing groups to displaced refugees. It is this sort of self-organization that is where the Internet shines. If we are indeed only a few degrees of separation from every other person on the planet, being able to navigate the small world becomes the conundrum. The Internet is the roadmap to the small world. We can find those that are like us, but can also discover those that are not. The Internet enables global awareness.